• English
    • en_USEnglish
    • en_GBEnglish
28 °c
26 ° Tue
26 ° Wed
26 ° Thu
26 ° Fri
Thursday, March 30, 2023
Asiafreepress
Advertisement
  • Home
    • Latest
  • World
  • Asia
    • China
    • Pakistan
    • Afghanistan
    • India
    • Central Asia
  • News
  • Politics
  • Security
  • Law
  • Business
  • Review
    • Editorial
    • Analysis
    • Perspective
    • Literature
  • Science & Tech
  • Entertainment
    • Showbiz
    • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Multimedia
Breaking News
Amnesty Int’l exposes India for using anti-terror, money laundering laws to silence dissentPakistan, Malaysia agree to revitalize bilateral mechanismsGermany prepares pomp for Charles III’s first foreign tripEU removes Pakistan from list of ‘High-Risk Third CountriesPoland beat Albania in Euro 2024 qualifier
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • Latest
  • World
  • Asia
    • China
    • Pakistan
    • Afghanistan
    • India
    • Central Asia
  • News
  • Politics
  • Security
  • Law
  • Business
  • Review
    • Editorial
    • Analysis
    • Perspective
    • Literature
  • Science & Tech
  • Entertainment
    • Showbiz
    • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Multimedia
No Result
View All Result
Asiafreepress
No Result
View All Result
Home Asia India

UNESCO and Kashmir; debunking India’s settler colonial project

Nasir Qadri by Nasir Qadri
November 15, 2021
in India, Latest, Pakistan, Perspective
0
UNESCO and Kashmir; debunking India’s settler colonial project

A paramilitary soldier stands guard as Indian national flag flutters on Hari Parbat Fort in Srinagar on August 15, 2021. (Photo by Abid Bhat / AFP) (Photo by ABID BHAT/AFP)

0
SHARES
434
VIEWS

Amid all the daily killings and human rights violations by the state, its Hindu extremists and their leaders are promoting UNESCO’s ‘creative city’ tag as ‘a diplomatic win’.

On November 8, Srinagar, the summer capital of the disputed territory of Jammu and Kashmir was selected among 49 cities worldwide to join the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization UNESCO’s Creative Cities Network (UCCN).

UCCN secretariat is administered by UNESCO, which ensures the network’s management at the global level. The initiative provides support to member cities through guidance, capacity-building materials, and opportunities for participation and collaboration, as well as promotes the network’s visibility through communication and advocacy, particularly at the international level.

In 2018, UNESCO denied a creative city consideration request for the Srinagar city. This year’s selection was approved after Srinagar Municipal Corporation (SMC) – a municipal body, in coordination with the Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage (INTACH) submitted a dossier, on Art and handicrafts, which is the major source of livelihood for many artisans in the valley. Kashmir’s arts and crafts such as handicrafts, shawls, papier-mâché, and woodwork etc. have been inherent to Kashmir’s culture for centuries generating livelihood for generations.


The ‘creative city’ tag may look good for the indigenous artisans. However the region with diverse cultures has been ravaged by the ongoing-armed conflict and the political dispute since 1947. When Indian colonial war machine arrived in the region, the city and the whole region witnessed devastating consequences on the local culture as well as the transformation of its art. Looking at the work of artists in Kashmir, one can notice how conflict, militarization, mourning, and defiance have come to influence their work.

Amid all the daily killings and human rights violations by the state, its Hindu extremists and their leaders are promoting UNESCO’s ‘creative city’ tag as ‘a diplomatic win’.

Indian Prime Minister Modi tweeted, “Delighted that beautiful Srinagar joins the UNESCO Creative Cities Network (UCCN) with a special mention for its craft and folk art. It is fitting recognition for the vibrant cultural ethos of Srinagar. Congratulations to the people of Jammu and Kashmir.”

The tweet followed by Indian Ministry of External Affairs Ministry, called it a “Moment of Pride for India”. A good number of Indian Hindu extremist, their offshoots and embedded journalists started calling it a ‘diplomatic win’ for India.

But is this really a diplomatic win?

Although there should be no room to politicise UNESCO’s UCCN, its aim and agenda which are clearly linked with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), making cities and human settlements comprehensive, safe, resilient, sustainable, socially inclusive, etc.

Srinagar has been the resistance bastion against the communal military occupation of the Muslim majority territory for more than 70 years.

UNESCO’s conventions safeguard world culture, a natural heritage in armed conflicts. So a decision to include a city on the list at the request of a colonial state has no bearing on the legality of the dispute.

Let’s question of site or city found on a disputed territory

The question creates two potential scenarios. The first is that if a State claims sovereignty and has effective control over territory ‘X’, such a territory could be applicable to be updated on the site of the World Heritage List.

The second scenario involves applications made by any state ‘B’ which has a claim on the territory ‘X’ on which the site is found but does not have effective control over it.

The Legal reference in the “convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage sites” in a disputed territory is found in Article 11(3) of the Convention which states:
“…The inclusion of a property situated in a territory, sovereignty or jurisdiction over which is claimed by more than one State shall in no way prejudice the rights of the parties to the dispute.”

The above Article clearly speaks nothing about whether applications of both types can be considered by UNESCO. It only explains that a decision to include a place on the list at the request of a State that has a territorial claim has no implication on the legal rights of any of the parties to the dispute.

Assuming if Pakistan, the contesting party of the 74-year-old dispute takes up the prevention of Historical sites in Indian occupied Kashmir or the issue of Historical mosques or cultural sites which are on the verge of devastation due to militarization. (Art. 6) of UNESCO applies here, which says, even if UNESCO decides to include a site found on a disputed territory at the request of a state which does not have control over the territory, the State in control of the territory is still required to uphold its obligation to cooperate with UNESCO.

SRINAGAR: A view of the locked up entrance to the historical Jamia Masjid, on March 27, 2020 in Srinagar, Jammu Kashmir. (Photo by Waseem Andrabi/Hindustan Times)

There is nothing in the language of the Convention that prevents States from applying to include such sites on the World Heritage List if they do not have effective control over it. The aim of the Convention is to protect and preserve cultural and natural sites, which have universal heritage value.

This aim may be emphasized when a site is found on disputed territory and the danger of its destruction increases because the state controlling the territory may deliberately try to destroy those sites that are of value to other contesting State.

In 1981 Jordan filed an application to include the Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls before UNESCO. On that occasion too, Israel who had effective control of the relevant territory opposed the application (this, by the way, was the straw that broke the U.S. camel’s back in the 1980s, triggering its withdrawal from UNESCO for twenty or so years). Therefore accepting applications from State Parties concerning sites situated in the disputed territory over which the applying state has no control is not a common practice by UNESCO.

Tags: creative cityIndiaIOJKPakistanSrinagarUCCNUNESCO
Previous Post

Hurriyat conference condemns additional deployment of armed forces in IOJK, terms situation as worrying and disturbing”

Next Post

Head of UK military warns of war with Russia

Nasir Qadri

Nasir Qadri

Nasir Qadri is a human Rights lawyer from IOJK, and is pursuing Phd in Law of Armed Conflict. He also heads an Islamabad based international advocacy group Legal Forum for Oppressed voices of Kashmir (LFOVK).

Next Post
Gen. Sir Nick Carter, the head of the UK’s armed forces

Head of UK military warns of war with Russia

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected test

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Jammu Genocide: Forgotten human carnage of disputed region

Jammu Genocide: Forgotten human carnage of disputed region

November 6, 2021
Heroic Tale of a Pakistani SULTAN in 1971 War

Heroic Tale of a Pakistani SULTAN in 1971 War

December 1, 2021
Indian forces kill under trial inmate in staged encounter in Kashmir

Indian forces kill under trial inmate in staged encounter in Kashmir

October 26, 2021
Peace, development make way to Xinjiang. Experts reject US allegations of genocide in Xinjiang China

Peace, development make way to Xinjiang. Experts reject US allegations of genocide in Xinjiang China

November 26, 2021
Pakistan summons Indian diplomat over killing of Muslims  in Assam

Pakistan summons Indian diplomat over killing of Muslims in Assam

4
Jammu Genocide: Forgotten human carnage of disputed region

Jammu Genocide: Forgotten human carnage of disputed region

4
Peace, development make way to Xinjiang. Experts reject US allegations of genocide in Xinjiang China

Peace, development make way to Xinjiang. Experts reject US allegations of genocide in Xinjiang China

3
India’s senior army officer booked on rape charges

India’s senior army officer booked on rape charges

3
Amnesty Int’l exposes India for using anti-terror, money laundering laws to silence dissent

Amnesty Int’l exposes India for using anti-terror, money laundering laws to silence dissent

March 29, 2023
Pakistan, Malaysia agree to revitalize bilateral mechanisms

Pakistan, Malaysia agree to revitalize bilateral mechanisms

March 29, 2023
Germany prepares pomp for Charles III’s first foreign trip

Germany prepares pomp for Charles III’s first foreign trip

March 29, 2023
EU removes Pakistan from list of ‘High-Risk Third Countries

EU removes Pakistan from list of ‘High-Risk Third Countries

March 29, 2023

Recent News

Amnesty Int’l exposes India for using anti-terror, money laundering laws to silence dissent

Amnesty Int’l exposes India for using anti-terror, money laundering laws to silence dissent

March 29, 2023
Pakistan, Malaysia agree to revitalize bilateral mechanisms

Pakistan, Malaysia agree to revitalize bilateral mechanisms

March 29, 2023
Germany prepares pomp for Charles III’s first foreign trip

Germany prepares pomp for Charles III’s first foreign trip

March 29, 2023
EU removes Pakistan from list of ‘High-Risk Third Countries

EU removes Pakistan from list of ‘High-Risk Third Countries

March 29, 2023
Asiafreepress

Follow Asia Free Press (AFP) on Twitter, Facebook, Linkedin, Youtube and Instagram for the latest news from China, Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, Kashmir and across Asia.

Follow Us

Photo Gallery

Quick Links

  • Submission Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Stay in Touch

To be updated with all the latest news, offers, and special announcements.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • Latest
  • World
  • Asia
    • China
    • Pakistan
    • Afghanistan
    • India
    • Central Asia
  • News
  • Politics
  • Security
  • Law
  • Business
  • Review
    • Editorial
    • Analysis
    • Perspective
    • Literature
  • Science & Tech
  • Entertainment
    • Showbiz
    • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Multimedia

en_USEnglish (United States)
en_GBEnglish (UK) en_USEnglish (United States)